Wage cuts — the ultimate atomistic fallacy

4 April, 2017 at 15:58 | Posted in Economics | 1 Comment

The world has been slow to realize that we are living this year in the shadow of one of the greatest economic catastrophes of modern history. But now that the man in the street has become aware of what is happening, he, not knowing the why and wherefore, is as full to-day of what may prove excessive fears as, previously, when the trouble was first coming on, he was lacking in what would have been a reasonable anxiety. He begins to doubt the future …

John-Maynard-Keynes-007

In this quandary individual producers base illusory hopes on courses of action which would benefit an individual producer or class of producers so long as they were alone in pursuing them, but which benefit no one if everyone pursues them … If a particular producer or a particular country cuts wages, then, so long as others do not follow suit, that producer or that country is able to get more of what trade is going. But if wages are cut all round, the purchasing power of the community as a whole is reduced by the same amount as the reduction of costs; and, again, no one is further forward.

Thus neither the restriction of output nor the reduction of wages serves in itself to restore equilibrium.

The Great Slump of 1930

Advertisements

1 Comment

  1. Agreed! The less money we can earn, the less goods we can afford and so the less amount of work is needed during a subsequent time. Soon we shall be so deeply in debt as to make the present money system impractical.


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.