Why reading newspapers makes you stupid

7 February, 2017 at 12:19 | Posted in Politics & Society | 1 Comment

Lydon: You say newspapers make us stupid, and I’m not quite clear why.

Taleb: Because they always give you an explanation to events so that you have the feeling that you know what’s going on. They tell you the stock market went down, because of fear of a recession, and that’s false causation with uncertainty there. They check their facts, but you can’t check their causes. So, you have the feeling of over-causation from newspapers. That’s number one, the first one.

The second one: newspapers aren’t going to tell you “we had 280 deaths on the roads today in America”. They’re going to tell you about the plane crash killing 14 people. So, you have misrepresentation of the math of risks. They are driven by the sensational. And the statistical and the sensational are not the same in our modern world.

cw5is4bxeaa6kziThere’s a third thing about newspapers. Supplying someone with news reduces his understanding of the world. It’s more complicated than I can go into here, but let me tell you how I cope with it. I don’t mind knowing the news, but I go by a social filter. I eat lunch and dinner with other people. (I try to. I still have people who won’t eat lunch or dinner with me, even after writing the Black Swan). And I make sure. You can eavesdrop on conversations and stuff like that. I can tell if something is going on.

If there’s an event of significance, I know about it. And then I go to the web, or go buy a paper sometimes, or something like that.

Christopher Lydon interview with Nassim Nicholas Taleb

True face of Marine Le Pen

4 February, 2017 at 14:01 | Posted in Politics & Society | Leave a comment

 

Alternative facts — the latest Newspeak invention

3 February, 2017 at 18:36 | Posted in Politics & Society | Leave a comment

The US is today run by a president that thinks he can get away with never ending lies by simply calling them ” alternative facts.”

That’s of course nothing but Orwellian Newspeak — and George Orwell himself described the dangers of this postmodern mumbo jumbo truth-relativism already seventy-five years ago:

inconvenient-truthI know it is the fashion to say that most of recorded history is lies anyway. I am willing to believe that history is for the most part inaccurate and biased, but what is peculiar to our own age is the abandonment of the idea that history could be truthfully written. In the past, people deliberately lied, or they unconsciously colored what they wrote, or they struggled after the truth, well knowing that they must make many mistakes; but in each case they believed that “the facts” existed and were more or less discoverable. And in practice there was always a considerable body of fact which would have been agreed to by almost anyone … A British and a German historian would disagree deeply on many things, even on fundamentals, but there would still be a body of, as it were, neutral fact on which neither would seriously challenge the other. It is just this common basis of agreement with its implication that human beings are all one species of animal, that totalitarianism destroys. Nazi theory indeed specifically denies that such a thing as “the truth” exists. There is, for instance, no such thing as “Science”. There is only “German Science,” “Jewish Science,” etc. The implied objective of this line of thought is a nightmare world in which the Leader, or some ruling clique, controls not only the future but the past. If the Leader says of such and such an event, “It never happened” — well, it never happened. If he says that two and two are five — well two and two are five. This prospect frightens me much more than bombs …

Neoliberalism — a threat to democracy

31 January, 2017 at 19:02 | Posted in Politics & Society | 3 Comments

 

Perhaps the most dangerous impact of neoliberalism is not the economic crises it has caused, but the political crisis. As the domain of the state is reduced, our ability to change the course of our lives through voting also contracts. Instead, neoliberal theory asserts, people can exercise choice through spending. But some have more to spend than others: in the great consumer or shareholder democracy, votes are not equally distributed. The result is a disempowerment of the poor and middle. As parties of the right and former left adopt similar neoliberal policies, disempowerment turns to disenfranchisement. Large numbers of people have been shed from politics.
donald-trumpChris Hedges remarks that “fascist movements build their base not from the politically active but the politically inactive, the ‘losers’ who feel, often correctly, they have no voice or role to play in the political establishment”. When political debate no longer speaks to us, people become responsive instead to slogans, symbols and sensation. To the admirers of Trump, for example, facts and arguments appear irrelevant.

George Monbiot

‘Alternative facts’ and voter fraud

27 January, 2017 at 18:53 | Posted in Politics & Society | Leave a comment


Oh, horrible, oh, horrible, most horrible!
What a tragedy — and what shame, all those Americans with more than two brain cells must feel today. I do suffer with them through this nightmare.

Yours truly föreläser om nyliberalism

26 January, 2017 at 11:12 | Posted in Politics & Society | Leave a comment

forelas15974904_1354218084630079_409287222371248360_o

Smålands Nation
Kastanjegatan 7, Lund
2 februari kl. 18.00-20.00

Donald Trump’s running war on reality

25 January, 2017 at 15:51 | Posted in Politics & Society | Leave a comment

 

The inequality gap — five sickening facts

22 January, 2017 at 17:18 | Posted in Politics & Society | 2 Comments

140120171906-davos-income-inequality-oxfam-international-winnie-byanima-intv-00011911-story-top1 Just eight men own the same wealth as the 3.6 billion people who make up the poorest half of humanity. Although some of them have earned their fortune through talent or hard work, over half the world’s billionaires either inherited their wealth or accumulated it through industries prone to corruption and cronyism.

2 Seven out of 10 people live in a country that has seen a rise in inequality in the last 30 years.

3 The richest are accumulating wealth at such an astonishing rate that the world could see its first trillionaire in just 25 years. So, you would need to spend $1 million every day for 2738 years to spend $1 trillion.

4 Extreme inequality across the globe is having a tremendous impact on women’s lives. Employed women, who face high levels of discrimination in the work place, and take on a disproportionate amount of unpaid care work often find themselves at the bottom of the pile. On current trends, it will take 170 years for women to be paid the same as men.

5 Corporate tax dodging costs poor countries at least $100 billion every year. This is enough money to provide an education for the 124 million children who aren’t in school and prevent the deaths of at least six million children thanks to health care services.

Oxfam

January 20, 2017 — a date that will live in infamy

19 January, 2017 at 18:26 | Posted in Politics & Society | 9 Comments

How do you grieve for a nation? I don’t know.

But one thing I do know is that January 20 will be one of the saddest days I and all my American friends have ever experienced.

That a country that has given us presidents like George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, and Franklin D. Roosevelt, is going to be run by a witless clown like Donald Trump is an absolute disgrace.

don

Neoliberal a(u)ction

19 January, 2017 at 11:06 | Posted in Politics & Society | 5 Comments

 

Next Page »

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.