28 November, 2015 at 12:05 | Posted in Politics & Society | Leave a comment


Neoliberal privatization — what a great idea …

Intolerance against intolerance

25 November, 2015 at 11:19 | Posted in Politics & Society | 3 Comments

We teachers do our best to be Socratic, to get our job of re-education, secularization, and liberalization done by conversational exchange. That is true up to a point, but what about assigning books like Black Boy, The Diary of Anne Frank, and Becoming a Man? The racist or fundamentalist parents of our students say that in a truly democratic society the students should not be forced to read books by such people – black people, Jewish people, homosexual people. They will protest that these books are being jammed down their children’s throats. I cannot see how to reply to this charge without saying something like “There are credentials for admission to our democratic society, credentials which we liberals have been making more stringent by doing our best to excommunicate racists, male chauvinists, homo- phobes, and the like. tolerance-does-not-mean-tolerating-intoleranceYou have to be educated in order to be a citizen of our society, a participant in our conversation, someone with whom we can envisage merging our horizons. So we are going to go right on trying to discredit you in the eyes of your children, trying to strip your fundamentalist religious community of dignity, trying to make your views seem silly rather than discussable. We are not so inclusivist as to tolerate intolerance such as yours.”

I have no trouble offering this reply, since I do not claim to make the distinction between education and conversation on the basis of anything except my loyalty to a particular community, a community whose interests required re-educating the Hitler Youth in 1945 and required re-educating the bigoted students of Virginia in 1993. I don’t see anything herrschaftsfrei about my handling of my fundamentalist students. Rather, I think those students are lucky to find themselves under the benevolent Herrschaft of people like me, and to have escaped the grip of their frightening, vicious, dangerous parents.

Richard Rorty

Although Rorty’s view is pointing in the right direction re handling intolerance, his epistemization of the concept of truth makes the persuasive force of the argumentation weaker than necessary. Jürgen Habermas gives the reason why:

As soon as the concept of truth is eliminated in favor of a context-dependent epistemic validity-for-us, the normative reference point necessary to explain why a proponent should endeavor to seek agreement for ‘p’ beyond the boundaries of her own group is missing. The information that the agreement of an increasingly large audience gives us increasingly less reason to fear that we will be refuted presupposes the very interest that has to be explained: the desire for “as much intersubjective agreement as possible.” If something is ‘true’ if and only if it is recognized as justified “by us” because it is good “for us,” there is no rational motive for expanding the circle of members. No reason exists for the decentering expansion of the justification community especially since Rorty defines “my own ethnos” as the group in front of which I feel obliged to give an account of myself.

Free rider problem

24 November, 2015 at 20:26 | Posted in Politics & Society | 1 Comment


George Washington

20 November, 2015 at 18:32 | Posted in Politics & Society | Leave a comment


The open society and its enemies

15 November, 2015 at 16:37 | Posted in Politics & Society | Comments Off on The open society and its enemies

Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them … We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant.

Karl Popper The Open Society and Its Enemies (1945)


Håller du inte måttet? Det gör inget. Du är kränkt!

5 November, 2015 at 18:07 | Posted in Politics & Society | Leave a comment

Fick du för dåliga betyg? Höll inte uppsatsen måttet? Vågade någon tala om för dig att du gjort ett dåligt arbete eller inte ansträngt dig nog? Det gör inget! För nu för tiden kan alla slö, slappa, lata och likgiltiga komma undan det egna ansvaret med tidens egen deus ex machina — de är kränkta. Och simsalabim är problemet inte längre deras utan den som hade fräckheten att våga påtala bristerna och undermåligheten.

O tempora, o mores!


Displaying the ridiculousness of libertarianism

3 November, 2015 at 10:33 | Posted in Politics & Society | 1 Comment



[h/t Jan Milch]

Falsk matematik

30 October, 2015 at 11:49 | Posted in Politics & Society | 1 Comment



Ein Volk schreibt Geschichte

27 October, 2015 at 17:32 | Posted in Politics & Society | Leave a comment


Time for a new sojourn in my second hometown — Berlin.

Paul “Chicolini” Ryan

24 October, 2015 at 10:53 | Posted in Politics & Society | Leave a comment


“He may talk like an idiot, he may look like an idiot. But don’t let that fool you, he really is an idiot.”

Next Page »

Create a free website or blog at | The Pool Theme.
Entries and comments feeds.