John Maynard Keynes — an introduction

11 april, 2019 kl. 18:03 | Publicerat i Economics | 4 kommentarer

 

4 kommentarer »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. As usual with Keynes and his past or present followers, their depiction of classical political economy is a fairy tale. There is not a single word about a supposed equilibrium in the labour market in Smith, Ricardo or Marx’s writings. The featured explanation about the causes of unemployment is based on neoclassical economics, and not on classical political economy.

    • A part of the confusion for modern readers of Keynes may be that when Keynes talks about ”classical economics” he often refers to what we today call ”neoclassical economics” 🙂

      • But how can we ever end this confusion, Lars, if we don’t point it out every single time it comes up?

        In my opinion, the proper distinction between classical and neoclassical economics is of utmost importance for the much-needed overhaul of mainstream economic theory.

        • I agree, but we cannot, unfortunately, rewrite history. We have to live with the sad fact that terms change meaning over time. And make sure that people know which meaning we are referring to. As someone who has written five books on the history of economic thought, I know it can sometimes be difficult. But as the French have it — il faut s’efforcer 🙂


Kommentera

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Google-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Google-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut /  Ändra )

Ansluter till %s

Blogga med WordPress.com.
Entries och kommentarer feeds.