Confusing statistics and research

29 November, 2015 at 15:08 | Posted in Statistics & Econometrics | 1 Comment

140113.bigdataCoupled with downright incompetence in statistics, we often find the syndrome that I have come to call statisticism: the notion that computing is synonymous with doing research, the naïve faith that statistics is a complete or sufficient basis for scientific methodology, the superstition that statistical formulas exist for evaluating such things as the relative merits of different substantive theories or the “importance” of  the causes of a “dependent variable”; and the delusion that decomposing the covariations of some arbitrary and haphazardly assembled collection of variables can somehow justify not only a “causal model” but also, praise a mark, a “measurement model.” There would be no point in deploring such caricatures of the scientific enterprise if there were a clearly identifiable sector of social science research wherein such fallacies were clearly recognized and emphatically out of bounds.

Dudley Duncan

Advertisements

1 Comment

  1. […] Bild från ett inlägg av Lars Pålsson Syll här. […]


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Blog at WordPress.com.
Entries and comments feeds.